Pdf transformational generative grammar

To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. To browse Academia. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Transformational and generative grammar. D Terence Langendoen. A short summary of this paper. Download Download PDF. Translate PDF. People are often confused b; the adjective "generative"? See pages 67 of Chomsky. The first section will discuss major definitions regarding the Generative Grammar, mainly subcategorisation rules, giving a general idea of how the base component operates.

We start from the deep structure to the surface structure. That is, we will start from the abstract category symbols generated by the categorial component or phrase structure rules , and stage by stage till the surface structure is generated.

In every stage, there is a definition entry accompanied with examples and a continued interpretation. The insertion of lexicon will not be by convention but by the means of the interpretive rules the semantic component applies. Presumably, all the definitions given in this section are based on Chomsky , Chapter 2. The second section will be indeed reversal to the first one.

The primary concern of this section is to analyse some Movement Transformations. We will start from the surface structure, assuming a transformational rule, drawing tree diagrams of the deep structure, and analysing every diagram with respect to the structural description and structural change. This section is based on Heny et Akmajian 4, Chapter 5 , elaborating on different transformational rules.

This is not an exhaustive investigation of all Movement Transformations, yet it is only an initiation. Eventually, it should be noted that the italicized typing of the lexicon and the surface structures represents phonological interpretation. This mechanism categorises and subcategorises by the means of a system of rewriting rules. That is, a rewriting rule expands a single category symbol as one or two categories, or subcategory symbols complex symbols with respect to the left-and-right order.

This sequence of categorial rules refers to categorisation. Hence, a categorial rule is a rewriting rule that branches two categories with respect to the order of the constituents of the deep structure of the sentence. They have two seperate functions: a they define the system of grammatical relations, and b they determine the ordering in the deep structure. The essence of categorial rules is that they determine whether a constituent modifies a sentence, or it is dominated by another constituent within the deep structure of a sentence.

However, they are not sufficient for the insertion of the lexicon. They should occur in accordance with the subcategorisation rules. In fact, subcategorisation rules operate within the syntactic context of categorial rules.

Besides, categorial rules are applied in a sequential derivation. That is, in the deep structure of a sentence, they start initially from the symbol S stands for sentence that expands as the constituents NP Noun Phrase , Aux Auxiliary and VP Verb Phrase , to a terminal string in which category symbols can no longer expand, and therefore, the derivation is terminated.

For instance, category symbols like N, V, Det, Prep, and Adj are terminal because they can no longer derive to other categories. That is, every deep structure of a sentence in English should be generated from that rule. We say it dominates all other subrules in the deep structure. Aux incorporates the information such as Tense, Modal, Aspect , which is determined by subcategorisation rules.

The VP contains the base of the Verb in the deep structure and other categories that relate to the Verb Complement, Adverb, etc.. The VP dominates all other constituents which make part of the predicate of the deep structure of the sentence. For instance, the base component applies the following sequential derivation of categorial rules 8: 1. That is, there is no more branching.

Moreover, still the insertion of the lexicon formatives is not possible. There should be other rules to apply. Those Features can be either inherent or contextual features. That is, prior context-free subacategorisation for V ,N, and Det. For every lexical representation, there should be inherent features, and therefore the lexicon is subcategorised under the sequence of D,C , where D stands for a lexical category 10 or formatives, and C stands for complex symbol which contains specified inherent features.

The following figure illustrates the two types of context-sensitive subcategorisation respectively. That is, at the first level of interpretation the semantic component interprets V, using syntactic information, in the following way: Since V in string 9 is set between two Nouns, that is, immediately a N precedes the V and a N follows the V, and since the first N on the left refers to the Subject of the sentence, and the second N on the right can be either Subject Complement, Object of the Verb, or a Direct Object, there are three possibilities for V to be strictly sucategorised.

V is either a Copula, Middle Verb, or Monotransitive. That is, there are three possible lexicon entries for V. We call this type of rules that determine the possible lexicon entries for V with respect to the position of V in the terminal string of categories in the deep structure of a sentence as context-sensitive strict subcategorisation rules. Still N, Det, and N are not inserted.

There should be other rules to apply 1. The latter is necessary for Subject-Verb Agreement. Furthermore, once right N is selected in every substring in 12 , the right N will also select the Det.

The same process will be followed for other two substrings. We summarize the findings in a table. The House of Commons have John might have two caps. The two categories X and Y are sisters, as they are dominated by one node. X and Y can be subject to derivation, and therefore they can form both of them two nodes. Returning now to chapter 1. We shall draw a tree diagram of the string 9 , including temporarily the complex symbols of all categories.

The SD describes the order of constituents in the input tree tree diagram of the deep structure by assigning for every constituent a number term.

The SC describes the order of the constituents in the output tree tree diagram of the surface structure , and consequently it will determine which transformation occurs. A transformation can apply to an input tree if and only if the input tree is analyzable in accordance with the structural description.

That is, if the input tree does not satisfy the conditions of the SD, the transformational rule does not apply. Germany was defeated by England. Her baby has been called George. The element by is inserted in the SC adjoining the NP node in the term 1. Such insertion does not build any new structure, such as PP, but rather by is sister-adjoined of V and Chomsky-adjoined of NP term 1 without affecting the structure of NP term 1. It should be noted that the Passive Transformation in case a is optional.

However, this time the subject in the deep structure is an indefinite pronoun which will require an agent deletion transformation. Two transformations should occur, Movement and Insertion according to the following rule. The latter is adjoined to the Aux node and becomes its rightmost daughter.

The fifth term does not change. Eventually the following structure is generated: Her baby has been called George by someone. Another transformation should apply to generate the structure b. They refuse permission to enter to visitors. They refuse visitors permission to enter. They built a park for the residents. They built the residents a park. They built it for the residents.

This transformational rule is a governed rule, that is, it depends on the specific main verb of the sentence. Accordingly, Dative Movement has the effect of moving the indirect object the second NP, the prepositional complement to the position immediately following the verb, thus making that NP the new direct object, and deleting the preposition to or for. For the house to be painted would irritate John Extraposition is not applied ii.

It would irritate John for the house to be painted Extraposition is applied iii.